The Cost-Shifting Gap

Michigan applies rigorous subsidy analysis to data centers — but not to residential electrification

The MPSC requires data center customers to prove they pay all costs of service with no cross-subsidization. No equivalent analysis exists for the EWR and MEAP surcharges that fund residential efficiency and electrification measures.

Data center / large load protections
Exhaustive scrutiny applied
vs.
Residential electrification surcharges
Minimal analysis documented
~$5.80/mo
Residential surcharges for EWR + MEAP combined: ~$2.00 electric EWR + ~$2.55 gas EWR + $1.25 MEAP. Small per household — but the subsidy flows are unanalyzed.
0
Cost-allocation studies in this corpus examining whether non-adopters cross-subsidize heat pump or electrification participants through EWR surcharges.
"No other residential, commercial, or industrial customer may subsidize the costs of a new large load customer."
— Commissioner Peretick on Case No. U-21859 (Consumers Energy GPD rate for data centers). The Commission applies this principle rigorously to industrial loads but has not applied the same framework to residential electrification surcharges.
Sources: Data center protections (U-21859) — Annual Report p.42-43. DTE contract (U-21990, 1,383 MW) — Annual Report p.43. EWR surcharges ($2.00 elec, $2.55 gas) — 2024 EWR Report p.3. MEAP ($1.25/mo) — Annual Report p.29. Peretick quote — transcript analysis, U-21859. Absence of cost-allocation studies — determined by review of all five Michigan source documents.