Program Equity — Massachusetts Case Study

EJ communities pay the most into Mass Save, receive the least

The State Auditor documented that communities with the highest EJ populations and renter rates contribute disproportionately more per capita — while receiving fewer benefits.

151%
More per capita contributed by 90%+ EJ communities vs. non-EJ (Finding 2)
3.2×
Higher contribution rate for Gateway Cities relative to income vs. state average (Finding 2)
93%
Of high-density municipalities are net contributors, not beneficiaries (Finding 3)
"Low-income communities are subsidizing this program for wealthier people and wealthier communities. That's just totally backwards." — Alex Pratt, Malden Strategic Planning (quoted in State Auditor press release, Sept 29, 2025)
Sources: All figures from Office of State Auditor Diana DiZoglio, "Who Pays and Who Gains? Analyzing Contributors and Beneficiaries of the Mass Save Program," Sept 29, 2025, mass.gov/audit. Per capita values from Finding 1 (state average $66.95), Finding 2 (EJ $90.67, GC $77.76 vs. non-GC $62.96), Finding 3 (high-density beneficiary rate). Quotes: Auditor press release, mass.gov/news, Sept 29, 2025; Boston Globe, Oct 1, 2025.